EAC for Equipment Operating
under Excess Pressure under TR CU 032/2013
Certification under TR CU 032/2013 “On the Safety of Equipment Operating under Excess Pressure”
TR CU 032/2013 is a key EAEU technical regulation for equipment operating under excess pressure. If a product falls within the scope of the regulation, conformity assessment becomes a mandatory condition for lawful import and placing on the EAEU market.
We work with European manufacturers and trading companies seeking access to the EAEU market. It is important to understand that the familiar European compliance logic, including CE, and the EAEU logic are different systems. Therefore, our task is not to “issue a document”, but to build the procedure so that the result is robust: the applicability of the requirements is determined correctly, the form of assessment and the scheme are selected correctly, testing is carried out to the required standards, and the technical file contains no weak points.
What is TR CU 032/2013 and what is it for?
The regulation establishes safety requirements for equipment operating under excess pressure and defines the rules for conformity assessment. In practical terms, it answers a direct question: is the product safe under normal operation and foreseeable conditions of use – in terms of design, materials, strength, testing, marking, and operating documentation.
For business, risks arise not “on paper”, but at specific points: during customs clearance, market surveillance, at the client’s site, in tenders, and in procurement. Therefore, we pay attention not only to the final document, but also to the evidence base and the correctness of execution so that the document is verifiable, valid, and does not create problems during supplies.
Download link for the regulation:
TR CU 032/2013 “On the Safety of Equipment Operating under Excess Pressure”
What equipment falls under TR CU 032/2013?
Mistakes most often begin with oversimplification “by product name”. In the EAEU, intended purpose, parameters, completeness, and supply format matter more: the product is supplied as an individual unit, as a system component, or as part of equipment.
To determine whether the regulation applies and which form of assessment is required, at the outset we ask for a minimum set of data: what the product is, how it is used, what the key parameters are, whether there are modifications, and how supplies are organized – batch or serial production. After that, it becomes clear which requirements actually apply and how to build the procedure without unnecessary rework.
Typical equipment groups
Pressure vessels
Boilers and boiler elements
Pipelines and components
By which parameters applicability is determined
Most often, the applicability of TR CU 032/2013 is determined by a combination of pressure parameters, dimensions, working medium, and intended purpose. These data affect the equipment category and the requirements for conformity assessment:
- Excess pressure (P)
- Volume (V) or nominal diameter (DN)
- Working medium – gas/liquid and its properties
- Temperature conditions
- Intended purpose and operating conditions
- Completeness and supply boundaries
- Availability of modifications/sizes
- Supply format: batch or serial production
Exceptions: when TR CU 032/2013 does not apply
The regulation contains exceptions – cases in which the equipment does not fall within the scope of TR CU 032/2013 or is assessed under other mandatory requirements. In practice, it is important to verify this before the start so that you avoid a situation where the project is carried out “under the wrong regulation” and then has to be redone.
Most often, exceptions occur in three scenarios:
Another regulatory sphere
There are types of equipment for which specialized requirements apply by industry or intended purpose. In such projects, we first determine which set of mandatory requirements applies in your case.
Equipment by intended purpose does not fall within the scope of TR CU 032/2013
Even if pressure is present, the product may not be regarded as an object ofthe regulation – the decision depends on how it is used, how the design is defined, and what exactly is included in the supply.
Product boundaries and completeness
Components, assemblies, and parts of systems may be interpreted differently: as standalone equipment or as an element assessed as part of a product. This is determined by the manufacturer’s documents and the actual supply boundaries.
Note: the exact decision on exceptions is taken based on the characteristics, intended purpose, and manufacturer’s documentation – exceptions are not determined “by name”.
Equipment category: why the form of assessment depends on it
TR CU 032/2013 uses a classification of equipment by categories depending on the parameters and the working medium. The category determines:
- whether certification is required or declaration is sufficient,
- which assessment scheme is applicable – batch or serial production,
- which evidence is required – testing, production analysis, inspection control, if provided for.
We treat classification as an engineering task: we check the parameters, the correctness of the source data, and the logic of applying the requirements so that a situation does not arise later where “the document exists, but it is challenged”.
Certificate or declaration: which to choose under TR CU 032/2013?
The key point is to determine the form of conformity assessment correctly. The legal mechanics are straightforward:
- EAEU Certificate of Conformity – issued through an accredited certification body, which issues the certificate.
- EAEU Declaration of Conformity – issued in the applicant’s name, the declaration is registered by the applicant, and responsibility for the correctness of the evidence lies with the applicant.
We help select the form and scheme so that you do not end up in a situation where “formally everything is done, but the document is weak”: the wrong scheme, disputable wording, unsuitable testing standards, or an incomplete technical file.
How we determine exactly what you need
We start with diagnostics – a short stage that saves weeks of corrections. At the outset, we define the intended purpose and parameters of the equipment, the scope of supply, the supply format – batch or serial production – the readiness of the documentation, and the project roles, including who will act as the applicant and whether an authorized representative in the EAEU is required.
Based on the diagnostic review, we develop a clear plan for you: what will be issued, under which scheme, and what evidence will be required so that the document is robust and verifiable.
What you get after diagnostics
We reduce the requirements of TR CU 032/2013 to specific actions for your product:
Stages of obtaining a certificate/declaration under TR CU 032/2013
We build the procedure transparently: first, we define the applicability of the requirements and collect the basic package of documents. Then we check it against the regulation and the selected scheme and, if necessary, help bring the documentation into working shape – this is almost always faster and more reliable than correcting mistakes at the registration stage.
Next, we organize testing in an accredited laboratory: we agree the test program, support sample selection/transfer, and make sure that the reports cover the requirements of the regulation and the selected scheme.
If serial production is involved and the scheme requires production assessment or inspection control, we define this in advance: what obligations will apply during the validity period of the document and how to prepare for them.
The final step depends on the form:
- Certificate is issued by the certification body,
- Declaration is registered by the applicant in accordance with the established procedure.
We control the correctness of the information so that the document is valid and verifiable in the register.
How Certification Works
-
Full Support Cycle
From analysis to document registration
-
Control at Every Stage
AnalysisRegulationsDocumentationTestingRegistration
Timing and cost: what affects the price?
We do not tie the service to a specific country – we work with European clients “for the EAEU market”. Therefore, timing and cost are determined not by geography, but by the volume of work and the evidence required.
In practice, the project budget is affected by the form of assessment – certificate or declaration – the scheme – batch or serial production – the equipment category, the scope of testing, and the readiness of the technical documentation. The better the source materials are prepared and the more accurately the applicability of the requirements is defined, the fewer unnecessary steps there are and the faster the project moves.
SITIX in figures
10+
years in certification
100+
completed projects
15+
partner countries
80%
returning clients
Advantages of registration under TR CU 032/2013
A correctly issued document under TR CU 032/2013 is not a “tick-box”, but an instrument of market access and risk management for equipment with increased safety requirements:
How to choose an accredited certification body?
The quality of the result largely depends on who performs the conformity assessment and how the evidence base is assembled. We work through a partner network and select competencies to fit the task, but if you choose partners yourself, keep to the guideline: accreditation in the required area, practical experience with your type of equipment, and clear communication.
If you are promised “everything in one day without documents”, this almost always means the risk of a weak result. In the EAEU, weaknesses show up later – when the document starts being checked: at the border, by the customer, or during inspections.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does my equipment fall under TR CU 032/2013?
What is required: a certificate or a declaration?
Can a document be issued without a company in the EAEU?
What documents are needed at the start?
Where is testing carried out?
Is production assessment or inspection control required?
Can the process be accelerated?
How can the document be checked in the register?
We will analyze
the project and present an action plan
